Abstract
ABSTRACT Studies relating accounting and price data often use the COMPUSTAT or related PDE data base as the source for the accounting data. This practice may introduce a look‐ahead bias and an ex‐post‐selection bias into the study. We examine this problem by comparing results from the standard COMPUSTAT data base with those from a data base which suffers from neither bias. We find that rates of return from portfolios chosen on the basis of accounting data from the two data bases differ significantly. Further, we find that these differences imply different conclusions when we test a specific hypothesis relating accounting and price data. Finally, we propose a number of remedies which may reduce the bias when the standard COMPUSTAT data base is used.
Keywords
Base (topology)AccountingEconometricsSelection biasSample (material)Selection (genetic algorithm)Computer scienceEconomicsStatisticsMathematics
Related Publications
Research notes and communications: The effect of product recall announcements on shareholder wealth
Abstract Previous research Has found that product recall announcements in the automobile industry are associated with negative abnormal returns. We extend this research by exami...
Another Look at the Cross‐section of Expected Stock Returns
ABSTRACT Our examination of the cross‐section of expected returns reveals economically and statistically significant compensation (about 6 to 9 percent per annum) for beta risk ...
The Cross‐Section of Realized Stock Returns: The Pre‐COMPUSTAT Evidence
ABSTRACT Using a database that is free of survivorship bias, this article finds that book‐to‐market equity, earnings yield, and cash flow yield have significant explanatory powe...
Structural and Return Characteristics of Small and Large Firms
ABSTRACT We examine differences in structural characteristics that lead firms of different sizes to react differently to the same economic news. We find that a small firm portfo...
The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns
ABSTRACT Two easily measured variables, size and book‐to‐market equity, combine to capture the cross‐sectional variation in average stock returns associated with market β , size...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1986
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 779-793
- Citations
- 265
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
265
OpenAlex
Cite This
Rolf W. Banz,
William J. Breen
(1986).
Sample‐Dependent Results Using Accounting and Market Data: Some Evidence.
The Journal of Finance
, 41
(4)
, 779-793.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04548.x
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1986.tb04548.x