Abstract
The environmental protection trial court, also known as the environmental resources trial court (henceforth referred to as the environmental court), is an institutional innovation in the field of environmental justice. To explore the influence of environmental judicial specialization on firms’ ESG performance and its mechanism, this study uses a sample of publicly traded firms from 2009 to 2022. The results demonstrate that environmental courts have significantly improved enterprises’ ESG performance. This conclusion remains valid following a series of robustness tests. From the three dimensions of ESG, environmental courts can significantly improve the performance of the corporate governance dimension in the current period. However, their impact on the environmental and social dimensions shows lagged effects. Environmental courts enhance enterprises’ ESG by reinforcing external constraints and internal impetus. The external constraint mechanism lies in enhancing government attention to green affairs, while the internal impetus mechanism lies in driving the digital transformation of companies. Based on the heterogeneity analysis, the positive effects of environmental courts are more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, those whose chairmen lack environmental protection backgrounds, and those located in cities with stronger public channels. It is essential to continuously deepen the specialization in environmental justice and refine the external pressure and internal motivation mechanisms to enhance enterprises’ ESG.
Related Publications
From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization
This study surveys the literature examining the privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) We review the history of privatization, the theoretical and empirical evidence on...
Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills
This paper challenges the prevalent notion that family-owned firms are more risk averse than publicly owned firms. Using behavioral theory, we argue that for family firms, the p...
Criminality and Psychiatric Disorders
THE WIDESPREAD concern over the apparently increasing crime rate needs no documentation. The extent of criminal behavior may be suggested by the following quotation from the 196...
Examining the “Family Effect” on Firm Performance
The purpose of this article is to provide an explanation for the contradictory evidence in the literature regarding the performance of family-owned firms. The article suggests t...
Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model
Abstract Data obtained from full‐time employees of a public sector organization in India were used to test a social exchange model of employee work attitudes and behaviors. LISR...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2025
- Type
- article
- Citations
- 0
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.15244/peai/213856