Abstract

This paper challenges the prevalent notion that family-owned firms are more risk averse than publicly owned firms. Using behavioral theory, we argue that for family firms, the primary reference point is the loss of their socioemotional wealth, and to avoid those losses, family firms are willing to accept a significant risk to their performance; yet at the same time, they avoid risky business decisions that might aggravate that risk. Thus, we propose that the predictions of behavioral theory differ depending on family ownership. We confirm our hypotheses using a population of 1,237 family-owned olive oil mills in Southern Spain who faced the choice during a 54-year period of becoming a member of a cooperative, a decision associated with loss of family control but lower business risk, or remaining independent, which preserves the family's socioemotional wealth but greatly increases its performance hazard. As shown in this study, family firms may be risk willing and risk averse at the same time.

Keywords

Socioemotional selectivity theoryFamily businessBusinessHazardControl (management)PopulationBusiness risksMicroeconomicsEconomicsActuarial scienceMarketingPsychologySociologyManagementRisk analysis (engineering)Demography

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2007
Type
article
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
106-137
Citations
3958
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3958
OpenAlex

Cite This

Luis R. Gómez‐Mejía, Katalin Takács Haynes, Manuel Núñez Nickel et al. (2007). Socioemotional Wealth and Business Risks in Family-controlled Firms: Evidence from Spanish Olive Oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly , 52 (1) , 106-137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106

Identifiers

DOI
10.2189/asqu.52.1.106