Keywords
Receiver operating characteristicMathematicsStatisticsStandard deviationStatisticNoise (video)Statistical hypothesis testingPattern recognition (psychology)GaussianArtificial intelligenceComputer science
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are used to describe and compare the performance of diagnostic technology and diagnostic algorithms. This paper refines the statis...
An Evaluation of Methods for Estimating the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve
The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve serves as one means for evaluating the performance of diagnostic and predictive test systems. The most commonly ...
Performance of Screening and Diagnostic Tests
Evaluation of psychiatric screening and diagnostic tests has benefited from the application of sensitivity, specificity, the kappa-statistic, and predictive values. These measur...
Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach
Methods of evaluating and comparing the performance of diagnostic tests are of increasing importance as new tests are developed and marketed. When a test is based on an observed...
The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets
Binary classifiers are routinely evaluated with performance measures such as sensitivity and specificity, and performance is frequently illustrated with Receiver Operating Chara...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1980
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 218-243
- Citations
- 177
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
177
OpenAlex
Cite This
Charles E. Metz,
Helen B. Kronman
(1980).
Statistical significance tests for binormal ROC curves.
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
, 22
(3)
, 218-243.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(80)90020-6
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/0022-2496(80)90020-6