Abstract

Research suggests that consumers are averse to relying on algorithms to perform tasks that are typically done by humans, despite the fact that algorithms often perform better. The authors explore when and why this is true in a wide variety of domains. They find that algorithms are trusted and relied on less for tasks that seem subjective (vs. objective) in nature. However, they show that perceived task objectivity is malleable and that increasing a task’s perceived objectivity increases trust in and use of algorithms for that task. Consumers mistakenly believe that algorithms lack the abilities required to perform subjective tasks. Increasing algorithms’ perceived affective human-likeness is therefore effective at increasing the use of algorithms for subjective tasks. These findings are supported by the results of four online lab studies with over 1,400 participants and two online field studies with over 56,000 participants. The results provide insights into when and why consumers are likely to use algorithms and how marketers can increase their use when they outperform humans.

Keywords

Computer scienceObjectivity (philosophy)Task (project management)Variety (cybernetics)Loss aversionArtificial intelligenceMachine learningCognitive psychologyPsychologyAlgorithm

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2019
Type
article
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
809-825
Citations
1008
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1008
OpenAlex

Cite This

Noah Castelo, Maarten W. Bos, Donald R. Lehmann (2019). Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion. Journal of Marketing Research , 56 (5) , 809-825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243719851788

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/0022243719851788