Abstract

As Everett Hughes noted, there is an “underside” to all work. Each job includes ways of doing things that would be inappropriate for those outside the guild to know. Illusions are essential for maintaining occupational reputation, but in the process they create a set of moral dilemmas. So it is with ethnographic work. This article describes the underside of ethnographic work: compromises that one frequently makes with idealized ethical standards. It argues that images of ethnographers—personal and public—are based on partial truths or self-deceptions. The focus is on three clusters of dilemmas: the classical virtues (the kindly ethnographer, the friendly ethnographer, and the honest ethnographer), technical skills (the precise ethnographer, the observant ethnographer, and the unobtrusive ethnographer), and the ethnographic self (the candid ethnographer, the chaste ethnographer, the fair ethnographer, and the literary ethnographer). Changes in ethnographic styles and traditions alter the balance of these deceptions but do not eliminate the need for methodological illusions.

Keywords

EthnographySociologyReputationAestheticsAnthropologySocial scienceArt

Related Publications

THE FUTURE OF MUSLIM NATIONS

Pakistan is an Islamic country. So is my country, Indonesia. But, though we recognize Islam to be the faith of the Indonesian people, we have not made an express mention of it i...

2016 Journal of medical education 0 citations

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
article
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
267-294
Citations
460
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

460
OpenAlex

Cite This

Gary Alan Fine (1993). TEN LIES OF ETHNOGRAPHY. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography , 22 (3) , 267-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022003001

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/089124193022003001