Abstract

Testing of precise (point or small interval) hypotheses is reviewed, with special emphasis placed on exploring the dramatic conflict between conditional measures (Bayes factors and posterior probabilities) and the classical P-value (or observed significance level). This conflict is highlighted by finding lower bounds on the conditional measures over wide classes of priors, in normal and binomial situations, lower bounds, which are much larger than the P-value; this leads to the recommendation of several alternatives to P-values. Results are also given concerning the validity of approximating an interval null by a point null. The overall discussion features critical examination of issues such as the probability of objective testing and the possibility of testing from confidence sets.

Keywords

Null hypothesisMathematicsPrior probabilityBinomial (polynomial)p-valueBayes' theoremConfidence intervalStatisticsNull (SQL)Statistical hypothesis testingEconometricsInterval (graph theory)Alternative hypothesisBayes factorPoint estimationValue (mathematics)Binomial distributionPosterior probabilityComputer scienceBayesian probabilityCombinatoricsData mining

Related Publications

Bayes Factors

Abstract In a 1935 paper and in his book Theory of Probability, Jeffreys developed a methodology for quantifying the evidence in favor of a scientific theory. The centerpiece wa...

1995 Journal of the American Statistical A... 11631 citations

Publication Info

Year
1987
Type
article
Volume
2
Issue
3
Citations
676
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

676
OpenAlex

Cite This

James O. Berger, Mohan Delampady (1987). Testing Precise Hypotheses. Statistical Science , 2 (3) . https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013238

Identifiers

DOI
10.1214/ss/1177013238