Keywords
ContingencySelection (genetic algorithm)Decision makerInvestment (military)Test (biology)Decision ruleAccountabilityOptimal decisionField (mathematics)Decision modelDecision analysisEconomicsEconometricsOperations researchPsychologyManagement scienceMicroeconomicsComputer scienceMathematical economicsDecision treeMathematicsArtificial intelligencePolitical scienceEpistemology
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Integrating Variable Risk Preferences, Trust, and Transaction Cost Economics
Transaction cost economics (TCE) relies on three behavioral assumptions in predicting how firms choose governance structures—bounded rationality, opportunism, and risk neutralit...
Capital Market Equilibrium with Transaction Costs
A two-asset, intertemporal portfolio selection model is formulated incorporating proportional transaction costs. The demand for assets is shown to be sensitive to these costs. H...
An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model
An intertemporal model for the capital market is deduced from the portfolio selection behavior by an arbitrary number of investors who aot so to maximize the expected utility o...
Empirical Problems of the Hierarchical Likelihood Ratio Test for Model Selection
Advocates of maximum likelihood (ML) approaches to phylogenetics commonly cite as one of their primary advantages the use of objective statistical criteria for model selection. ...
Asset Stocks and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Comment
In their paper, Dierickx and Cool suggest that the strategic factor markets model developed in Barney (Barney, J. B. 1986a. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and bus...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1979
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 228-244
- Citations
- 279
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
279
OpenAlex
Cite This
Daniel W. McAllister,
Terence R. Mitchell,
Lee Roy Beach
(1979).
The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility.
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
, 24
(2)
, 228-244.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(79)90027-8
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(79)90027-8