Abstract
(1) Biometrika (1963), 50, 335–52. ‘The choice of a second order rotatable design.’ By G. E. P. Box and N. R. DRAPER p. 343. In equation (2.3-1) in the denominator of the third term on the right-hand side read −3kλ2 for −3λ2.
Keywords
MathematicsCoefficient of variationCriticismStatisticsTerm (time)EconometricsVariation (astronomy)Mathematical economicsLaw
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The Clinical Utility of a Six‐Minute Walk Test in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease Patients
OBJECTIVES: To determine the test‐retest reliability of the distance covered and the steps taken to complete a 6‐minute walk test by peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD)...
Random Allocation in Observational Data
Conventional observational epidemiology has an unenviable reputation for generating false-positive findings,1,2 or "scares," as others call them.3 In 1993, for example, the New ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1965
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 303-303
- Citations
- 164
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
164
OpenAlex
Cite This
George E. P. Box,
Norman R. Draper
(1965).
The Distribution of the Coefficient of Variation; Comment on A criticism made by Koopmans, Owen and Rosenblatt.
Biometrika
, 52
(1-2)
, 303-303.
https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.303
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.303