The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs

Abstract

This study gives a synthesis of a model comparison assessing the technological feasibility and economic consequences of achieving greenhouse gas concentration targets that are sufficiently low to keep the increase in global mean temperature below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. All five global energy-environment-economy models show that achieving low greenhouse gas concentration targets is technically feasible and economically viable. The ranking of the importance of individual technology options is robust across models. For the lowest stabilization target (400 ppm CO2 eq), the use of bio-energy in combination with CCS plays a crucial role, and biomass potential dominates the cost of reaching this target. Without CCS or the considerable extension of renewables the 400 ppm CO2 eq target is not achievable. Across the models, estimated aggregate costs up to 2100 are below 0.8% global GDP for 550 ppm CO2 eq stabilization and below 2.5% for the 400 ppm CO2 eq pathway.

Keywords

Affiliated Institutions

• Université Grenoble Alpes FR
• Max Planck Institute for Meteorology DE
• Enerdata (France) FR
• Max Planck Society DE
• Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency NL
• University of Cambridge GB
• Paul Scherrer Institute CH
• Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research DE

Related Publications