Abstract

Feminists have made important contributions to sociology, but we have yet to transform the basic conceptual frameworks of the field. A comparison of sociology with anthropology, history, and literature–disciplines which have been more deeply transformed–suggests factors that may facilitate or inhibit feminist paradigm shifts. The traditional subject matter of sociology fell into a co-optable middle ground, neither as thoroughly male centered as in history or literature, nor as deeply gendered as in anthropology. In addition, feminist perspectives have been contained in sociology by functionalist conceptualizations of gender, by the inclusion of gender as a variable rather than as a theoretical category, and by being ghettoized, especially in Marxist sociology. Feminist rethinking is also affected by underlying epistemologies (proceeding more rapidly in fields based on interpretive rather than positivist understanding), and by the status and nature of theory within a discipline.

Keywords

SociologyPositivismEpistemologyField (mathematics)Subject (documents)Subject matterMarxist philosophySocial scienceAnthropologyGender studiesPoliticsPhilosophy

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES:

In spite of feminist recognition that hierarchical organizations are an important location of male dominance, most feminists writing about organizations assume that organization...

1990 Gender & Society 6630 citations

Publication Info

Year
1985
Type
article
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
301-316
Citations
531
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

531
OpenAlex

Cite This

Judith Stacey, Barrie Thorne (1985). The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology. Social Problems , 32 (4) , 301-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/800754

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/800754