Abstract

A functional framework for the perception of female physical attractiveness suggests that, at the least, perceivers should differentiate sexual (sexy), youthful, nonsexual (cute), and up-to-date clothed and groomed (trendy) dimensions. Further, it was hypothesized that these content-specific varieties of good looks would covary with physical features (the stimulus cues used by perceivers to decode particular attractiveness continua) and also with psychological inferences (the stereotypic expectations linked to each appearance dimension). Using 96 photographs of female professional fashion models as stimuli, a free-sorting method coupled with a multidimensional scaling analysis provided support for both of these expectations. Also, the results suggest areas of both convergence and divergence in how college student males and females view physical attractiveness in women.

Keywords

PsychologyAttractivenessPhysical attractivenessSocial psychologyPerceptionHuman physical appearanceMultidimensional scaling

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Revised standards for statistical evidence

Significance The lack of reproducibility of scientific research undermines public confidence in science and leads to the misuse of resources when researchers attempt to replicat...

2013 Proceedings of the National Academy o... 804 citations

Choices, values, and frames.

This book presents the definitive exposition of 'prospect theory', a compelling alternative to the classical utility theory of choice. Building on the 1982 volume, Judgement Und...

1984 American Psychologist 6327 citations

Publication Info

Year
1996
Type
article
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
1083-1104
Citations
48
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

48
OpenAlex

Cite This

Richard D. Ashmore, Michael R. Solomon, Laura Longo (1996). Thinking about Fashion Models' Looks: A Multidimensional Approach to the Structure of Perceived Physical Attractiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 22 (11) , 1083-1104. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962211001

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/01461672962211001