Abstract
The present double-standard approach to the valuation problem discriminates against owners of closely-held stock, that is, corporate shares which have no public market. The disparity of treatment is traceable to the unfortunate fact that, whereas actual sales or bona fide bid and asked prices govern the valuation for federal tax purposes of listed stocks and of unlisted stocks which "are dealt in through brokers or have a market," the criteria employed in valuing closely-held stock are predominantly subjective. This makes a paradise for "experts" but they seldom agree and few, if any, of their assumptions and conclusions are anything more than unverified, and not always wholly disinterested, hunches. As a consequence, disagreement between taxpayer and revenue agent is frequent and the process of resolving disagreement is long and costly and the event uncertain. In short, the whole merry-go-round of valuing closely-held stock is wasteful and unfair.\nThis paper and the study it reports are addressed to the possibility of improving the situation by making a fresh approach to the valuation of closely-held stock.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
The Impact of Capital Structure Change on Firm Value: Some Estimates
This study develops a model based on current corporate finance theories which explains stock returns associated with the announcement of issuer exchange offers. The major indepe...
SECURITY PRICES, RISK, AND MAXIMAL GAINS FROM DIVERSIFICATION*
Sections II and III of this paper set forth the simple logic which leads directly to the determination of explicit equilibrium prices of risk assets traded in competitive market...
Transactions Costs and Holding Periods for Common Stocks
Amihud and Mendelson (1986) and Constantinides (1986) provide a theoretical basis for the proposition that assets with higher transactions costs are held by investors for longer...
Large Shareholders as Monitors: Is There a Trade‐Off between Liquidity and Control?
This paper analyzes the incentives of large shareholders to monitor public corporations. We investigate the hypothesis that a liquid stock market reduces large shareholders' inc...
Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan
ABSTRACT This paper relates cross‐sectional differences in returns on Japanese stocks to the underlying behavior of four variables: earnings yield, size, book to market ratio, a...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1951
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 166-166
- Citations
- 9
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/3310111