Abstract

The present double-standard approach to the valuation problem discriminates against owners of closely-held stock, that is, corporate shares which have no public market. The disparity of treatment is traceable to the unfortunate fact that, whereas actual sales or bona fide bid and asked prices govern the valuation for federal tax purposes of listed stocks and of unlisted stocks which "are dealt in through brokers or have a market," the criteria employed in valuing closely-held stock are predominantly subjective. This makes a paradise for "experts" but they seldom agree and few, if any, of their assumptions and conclusions are anything more than unverified, and not always wholly disinterested, hunches. As a consequence, disagreement between taxpayer and revenue agent is frequent and the process of resolving disagreement is long and costly and the event uncertain. In short, the whole merry-go-round of valuing closely-held stock is wasteful and unfair.\nThis paper and the study it reports are addressed to the possibility of improving the situation by making a fresh approach to the valuation of closely-held stock.

Keywords

Valuation (finance)Stock (firearms)EconomicsActuarial scienceBusinessFinancial economicsEconometricsAccountingEngineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1951
Type
article
Volume
100
Issue
2
Pages
166-166
Citations
9
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

9
OpenAlex

Cite This

L. R. Johnson, Eli Shapiro, Joseph O' Meara (1951). Valuation of Closely-Held Stock for Federal Tax Purposes: Approach to an Objective Method. University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 100 (2) , 166-166. https://doi.org/10.2307/3310111

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/3310111