Variability in the likelihood of automatic attitude activation: Data reanalysis and commentary on Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, and Pratto (1992).

1993 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 106 citations

Abstract

This commentary addresses J. A. Bargh, S. Chaiken, R. Govender, and F. Pratto's (1992) conclusion that automatic attitude activation depends not on the idiosyncratic strength of the association in memory between an attitude object and an individual's evaluation of the object but on normative considerations constant across individuals. A variety of difficulties with the bases for this conclusion are discussed. Moreover, additional analyses of the J.A. Bargh et al. data reveal the superiority of an idiosyncratic measure of associative strength (a given individual's latency of response to an attitudinal inquiry) in predicting automatic attitude activation over the various normative measures (latency, extremity, ambivalence, polarization, and consensus or consistency) that were examined. These results support the theoretical premise that attitude activation varies as a function of position along an idiosyncratically defined attitude-nonattitude continuum.

Keywords

PsychologyNormativeSocial psychologyAssociative propertyAttitudeConsistency (knowledge bases)PremiseEpistemology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
letter
Volume
64
Issue
5
Pages
753-758
Citations
106
Access
Closed

External Links

Citation Metrics

106
OpenAlex

Cite This

Russell H. Fázio (1993). Variability in the likelihood of automatic attitude activation: Data reanalysis and commentary on Bargh, Chaiken, Govender, and Pratto (1992).. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 64 (5) , 753-758. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.753

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.753