Abstract

By examining the experimental data on the statistical properties of natural scenes together with (retinal) contrast sensitivity data, we arrive at a first principle, theoretical hypothesis for the purpose of retinal processing and its relationship to an animal's environment. We argue that the retinal goal is to transform the visual input as much as possible into a statistically independent basis as the first step in creating a redundancy reduced representation in the cortex, as suggested by Barlow. The extent of this whitening of the input is limited, however, by the need to suppress input noise. Our explicit theoretical solutions for the retinal filters also show a simple dependence on mean stimulus luminance: they predict an approximate Weber law at low spatial frequencies and a De Vries-Rose law at high frequencies. Assuming that the dominant source of noise is quantum, we generate a family of contrast sensitivity curves as a function of mean luminance. This family is compared to psychophysical data.

Keywords

LuminanceContrast (vision)Artificial intelligenceStimulus (psychology)Computer scienceSpatial frequencyVisual cortexAlgorithmRetinalRedundancy (engineering)PsychophysicsPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsComputer visionPsychologyOpticsPerceptionPhysicsCognitive psychologyNeuroscience

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

What Is the Goal of Sensory Coding?

A number of recent attempts have been made to describe early sensory coding in terms of a general information processing strategy. In this paper, two strategies are contrasted. ...

1994 Neural Computation 1213 citations

Publication Info

Year
1992
Type
article
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
196-210
Citations
732
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

732
OpenAlex
41
Influential
567
CrossRef

Cite This

Joseph J. Atick, Amanda Redlich (1992). What Does the Retina Know about Natural Scenes?. Neural Computation , 4 (2) , 196-210. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1992.4.2.196

Identifiers

DOI
10.1162/neco.1992.4.2.196

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%