Abstract
When evaluating empirical papers for publication, grant proposals, or individual contributions (e.g., awarding tenure), the basic question one should ask is how much the contribution adds to understanding in psychology and not whether the contribution takes a particular form or represents one particular model of how to do empirical studies. Academic psychology has flourished with its mastery of the hypothesis-experiment model of science and its expertise in generating and eliminating alternative hypotheses and isolating causation. These accomplishments are a critical part of psychology, and they are well and appropriately taught by psychologists. However, they are only a part of science and should not comprise the almost exclusive criteria for evaluating research. In particular, discovery of fundamental phenomena, such as functional relations that apply to the real world and have generality, should have a higher priority in psychology. Such findings have been the basis for theoretical advances in other natural sciences.
Keywords
GeneralityPerspective (graphical)CausationPublicationPsychologyExperimental psychologyEpistemologyEmpirical researchPsychological researchSocial psychologyCognitionComputer science
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Building Organizational Commitment: The Socialization of Managers in Work Organizations
Bruce Buchanan 11 Based on a questionnaire survey of 279 business and government managers, this study sheds light on two questions: (a) which organizational experiences have the...
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Leon Festinger's theory of cognitive dissonance has been widely recognized for its important and influential concepts in areas of motivation and social psychology. The theory of...
The ORCA quantum chemistry program package
In this contribution to the special software-centered issue, the ORCA program package is described. We start with a short historical perspective of how the project began and go ...
Designing biological systems
The design of artificial biological systems and the understanding of their natural counterparts are key objectives of the emerging discipline of synthetic biology. Toward both e...
The weirdest people in the world?
Abstract Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educa...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2009
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-439
- Citations
- 147
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
147
OpenAlex
Cite This
Paul Rozin
(2009).
What Kind of Empirical Research Should We Publish, Fund, and Reward?: A Different Perspective.
Perspectives on Psychological Science
, 4
(4)
, 435-439.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01151.x
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01151.x