Abstract

Aside from possible income effects, measures of the maximum amounts people will pay to avoid a loss and the minimum compensation necessary for them to accept it are generally assumed to be equivalent. Unexpectedly wide variations between these sums, however, have been noted in survey responses to hypothetical options. This paper reports the results of a series of experiments that confronted people with actual money payments and cash compensations. The results indicate that the compensation measure of value seems to exceed significantly the willingness to pay measure, which would appear to call into some question various rules of entitlement, damage assessments, and interpretations of indifference curves.

Keywords

EconomicsWillingness to payValue (mathematics)Compensation (psychology)MicroeconomicsEconometricsPsychologySocial psychologyMathematicsStatistics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment

The papers in this volume present a critical assessment of contingent valuation (CV). CV is a survey method that attempts to estimate individual values for economic goods by ask...

1993 Contributions to economic analysis 1129 citations

Publication Info

Year
1984
Type
article
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
507-507
Citations
1067
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1067
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jack L. Knetsch, Jack A. Sinden (1984). Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value. The Quarterly Journal of Economics , 99 (3) , 507-507. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885962

Identifiers

DOI
10.2307/1885962