Abstract
When surveyed about economic conditions, supporters of the president's party often report more positive conditions than its opponents. Scholars have interpreted this finding to mean that partisans cannot even agree on matters of fact. We test an alternative interpretation: Partisans give partisan congenial answers even when they have, or could have inferred, information less flattering to the party they identify with. To test this hypothesis, we administered two surveys to nationally representative samples, experimentally manipulating respondents' motivation to be accurate via monetary incentives and on-screen appeals. Both treatments reduced partisan differences in reports of economic conditions significantly. Many partisans interpret factual questions about economic conditions as opinion questions, unless motivated to see them otherwise. Typical survey conditions thus reveal a mix of what partisans know about the economy, and what they would like to be true.
Keywords
IncentivePerceptionEconomicsPolitical scienceMedia biasPublic economicsSocial psychologyPsychologyPoliticsMicroeconomicsLaw
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Similarities and Differences Between Left-Wing and Right-Wing Radicals
Although some scholars have argued that authoritarianism is characteristic only of the right and not of the left, persuasive reasons exist for doubting this claim. Intuitive obs...
Democracy and the Market
From the instrumental point of view, the key to liberal democracy is some system of voting. Democracy and electoral competition are regarded as virtually synonymous, with interp...
People's Strategies for Testing Hypotheses about Another's Personality: Confirmatory or Diagnostic?
The present paper reports two studies on information-gathering strategies that people use in testing hypotheses about another's personality. Subjects chose interview questions w...
Measure for Measure: An Experimental Test of Online Political Media Exposure
Self-reported measures of media exposure are plagued with error and questions about validity. Since they are essential to studying media effects, a substantial literature has ex...
Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition.
In this prize-winning book, one of the most prominent political theorists of our time makes a major statement about what democracy is and They may not an increase in, homogeneou...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2015
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 489-518
- Citations
- 405
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
405
OpenAlex
Cite This
Markus Prior,
Gaurav Sood,
Kabir Khanna
(2015).
You Cannot be Serious: The Impact of Accuracy Incentives on Partisan Bias in Reports of Economic Perceptions.
Quarterly Journal of Political Science
, 10
(4)
, 489-518.
https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014127
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1561/100.00014127