Abstract
The language of quality is getting rather dog-eared: all those assurances and all those apologies. Now, the Government are making the most of clinical mistakes in order to bring doctors to heel: perhaps not a very wise policy in the long term. Whatever the motives, the long-suffering public would like to have their faith in the NHS restored.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
NICE clinical guidelines: Maybe health economists should participate in guideline development
EDITOR—Wailoo et al highlight a fundamental challenge that the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) faces on a daily basis.1 The government established NICE not onl...
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONS?
This article discusses: the doctrinal content of the group of ideas known as ‘new public management’(NPM); the intellectual provenance of those ideas; explanations for their app...
Kant and the Kantian paradigm in international relations
Although few in number and limited in scope, Kant's writings on international relations have had a lasting influence and have given rise to a wide range of interpretations. Kant...
Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress
Not everyone here is a hero, which adds to the very human quality of the volume— people made mistakes and suffered, but those who survived have stories to tell. These stories ar...
Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation
The California water policy arena has been a notoriously conflictual environment, in which parties frequently were at odds with one another on multiple fronts simultaneously, fi...
Publication Info
- Year
- 2000
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 413-413
- Citations
- 5932
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.12968/bjhc.2000.6.9.19311