Abstract

A Bayesian consumer who is uncertain about the quality of an information source will infer that the source is of higher quality when its reports conform to the consumer's prior expectations. We use this fact to build a model of media bias in which firms slant their reports toward the prior beliefs of their customers in order to build a reputation for quality. Bias emerges in our model even though it can make all market participants worse off. The model predicts that bias will be less severe when consumers receive independent evidence on the true state of the world and that competition between independently owned news outlets can reduce bias. We present a variety of empirical evidence consistent with these predictions.

Keywords

ReputationQuality (philosophy)Competition (biology)Variety (cybernetics)Empirical evidenceBayesian probabilityEconomicsOrder (exchange)MarketingEconometricsAdvertisingBusinessComputer sciencePolitical science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2006
Type
article
Volume
114
Issue
2
Pages
280-316
Citations
980
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

980
OpenAlex

Cite This

Matthew Gentzkow, Jesse M. Shapiro (2006). Media Bias and Reputation. Journal of Political Economy , 114 (2) , 280-316. https://doi.org/10.1086/499414

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/499414