Abstract

The applicability of 5 conventional guidelines for construct measurement is critically examined: (a) Construct indicators should be internally consistent for valid measures, (b) there are optimal magnitudes of correlations between items, (c) the validity of measures depends on the adequacy with which a specified domain is sampled, (d) within-construct correlations must be greater than between-construct correlations, and (e) linear composites of indicators can replace latent variables. A structural equation perspective is used, showing that without an explicit measurement model relating indicators to latent variables and measurement errors, none of these conventional beliefs hold without qualifications. Moreover, a causal indicator model is presented that sometimes better corresponds to the relation of indicators to a construct than does the classical test theory effect indicator model.

Keywords

Structural equation modelingPerspective (graphical)PsychologyEconometricsCognitive psychologySocial psychologyStatisticsComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1991
Type
article
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
305-314
Citations
3332
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

3332
OpenAlex

Cite This

Kenneth A. Bollen, Richard D. Lennox (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.. Psychological Bulletin , 110 (2) , 305-314. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305