Abstract
Historically, acquisition scholars and practitioners have adopted a choice perspective which portrays the corporate executive analyzing acquisition opportunities as a rational decision maker. This paper suggests that the choice perspective be supplemented with a process perspective which recognizes the acquisition process itself as a potentially important determinant of activities and outcomes. A series of research propositions is offered suggesting how four impediments present in the process itself might affect acquisition outcomes.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Optimal Strategies and Minimax Lower Bounds for Online Convex Games
A number of learning problems can be cast as an Online Convex Game: on each round, a learner makes a prediction x from a convex set, the environment plays a loss function f, and...
Practical Variational Inference for Neural Networks
Variational methods have been previously explored as a tractable approximation to Bayesian inference for neural networks. However the approaches proposed so far have only been a...
A perspective on multiaccess channels
The information theoretic approach and the collision resolution approach to multiaccess channels are reviewed in terms of the underlying communication problems that both are mod...
Burnout and Intention to Leave Among Mental Health-Care Professionals: A Social Psychological Approach
In this study, burnout and intention to leave are investigated from a social psychological perspective. By employing covariance structure modeling (LISREL 8), a model is tested ...
Identification and Some Conditions of Organizational Involvement
Eight hundred thirty four employees in twenty-six organization branches of the Tennessee Valley Authority participated in a survey. Indices were constructed to test a set of hyp...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1986
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 145-163
- Citations
- 982
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.5465/amr.1986.4282648