Abstract

If the concept of organizational commitment is to have any analytical utility, it must be differentiated from the concept of expectancy. Viewing commitment and expectancy as two independent behavioral forces makes it possible to explain instances of commitment not explicable according to exchange or expectancy theories, such as remaining with an organization despite reward valences being reduced, inequity developing, and expectations not being met. Commitment defined as a force that maintains behavioral direction when expectancy/equity conditions are not met has at least four sources: investments, reciprocity, lack of alternatives, and identification.

Keywords

Expectancy theoryOrganizational commitmentPsychologyOrganizational changeOrganizational behaviorSocial psychologyEmployee motivationHuman resource managementManagementPublic relationsPolitical scienceEconomics

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1981
Type
article
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
589-599
Citations
482
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

482
OpenAlex

Cite This

Richard W. Scholl (1981). Differentiating Organizational Commitment From Expectancy as a Motivating Force. Academy of Management Review , 6 (4) , 589-599. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1981.4285698

Identifiers

DOI
10.5465/amr.1981.4285698