Abstract
Organizations frequently adopt formal rules, contracts, or other legalistic mechanisms when interpersonal trust is lacking. But recent research has shown such legalistic “remedies” for trust-related problems to be ineffective in restoring trust. To explain this apparent ineffectiveness, this paper outlines a theory that distinguishes two dimensions of trust—task-specific reliability and value congruence—and shows how legalistic mechanisms respond only to reliability concerns, while ignoring value-related concerns. Organizational responses to employees with HIV/AIDS are used as a case illustration that supports the theory's major propositions. The paper concludes with an agenda for future research.
Keywords
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Straining for Shared Meaning in Organization Science: Problems of Trust and Distrust
We present a problem-centered organizing framework of trust, in which prominent conceptualizations of trust and distrust from the organizational and allied social sciences are c...
Doing Democracy Up-Close: Culture, Power, and Communication in Community Building
This article considers how democracy gets done, and undone, at the micro-level of the planning meeting. I use concepts of social performance to frame issues of culture and power...
The Strategy of Conflict
I. Elements of a Theory of Strategy 1. The Retarded Science of International Strategy 2. An Essay on Bargaining 3. Bargaining, Communication, and Limited War II. A Reorientation...
TRUST AND DISTRUST IN ORGANIZATIONS: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions
▪ Abstract Scholarly interest in the study of trust and distrust in organizations has grown dramatically over the past five years. This interest has been fueled, at least in par...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1993
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 367-392
- Citations
- 1510
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
Cite This
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1287/orsc.4.3.367