Abstract

Decision theoretic equations were used to estimate the impact of a valid test (the Programmer Aptitude Test; PAT) on productivity if it were used to select new computer programmers for one year in (a) the federal government and (b) the national economy. A newly developed technique was used to estimate the standard deviation of the dollar value of employee job performance, which in the past has been the most difficult and expensive item of required information to estimate. For the federal government and the U.S. economy, separately, results are presented for different selection ratios and for different assumed values for the validity of previously used selection procedures. The impact of the PAT on programmer productivity was substantial for all combinations of assumptions. The results support the conclusion that hundreds of millions of dollars in increased productivity could be realized by increasing the validity of selection decisions in this occupation. Likely similarities between computer programmers and other occupations are discussed. It is concluded that the impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity is considerably greater than most personnel psychologists have believed.

Keywords

Selection (genetic algorithm)PsychologyProductivityWork (physics)Personnel selectionWork forceApplied psychologyManagement scienceEconometricsStatisticsComputer scienceEconomicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringMathematicsMechanical engineering

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1979
Type
article
Volume
64
Issue
6
Pages
609-626
Citations
425
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

425
OpenAlex
17
Influential
253
CrossRef

Cite This

Frank L. Schmidt, John E. Hunter, Robert C. McKenzie et al. (1979). Impact of valid selection procedures on work-force productivity.. Journal of Applied Psychology , 64 (6) , 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.6.609

Identifiers

DOI
10.1037/0021-9010.64.6.609

Data Quality

Data completeness: 77%