Abstract

Managers use mental models of markets to simplify and impose order on complex and ambiguous competitive environments and isolate points of competitive advantage or deficiency. In this study of senior managers of 190 businesses, the authors found four different types of mental models or representations of competitive advantage, varying in the emphasis placed on customer or management judgments about where and how competitors differ. These representations were influenced equally by pressure points in the environment and choice of strategy. The type of representation was also strongly associated with constrained patterns of information search and usage, raising the possibility that the necessary simplifications and narrowing of perspective may come at the cost of myopia and insensitivity to challenges from unexpected directions. There was also a strong association between the completeness of the managerial representation and relative financial performance, which supports related studies on the profitability of a market orientation.

Keywords

Competitor analysisCompetitive advantageRepresentation (politics)Order (exchange)Profitability indexPerspective (graphical)BusinessCompleteness (order theory)MarketingIndustrial organizationDiversity (politics)Computer scienceMathematicsSociologyArtificial intelligence

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1994
Type
article
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
31-44
Citations
695
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

695
OpenAlex

Cite This

George S. Day, Prakash Nedungadi (1994). Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Marketing , 58 (2) , 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800203

Identifiers

DOI
10.1177/002224299405800203