Abstract
The susceptibility to social desirability response bias of four alternative methods of measuring the importance of job and organizational characteristics is examined. Data were collected from 86 gr...
Keywords
PsychologySocial psychologySocial desirabilityResponse biasOrganizational behaviorSocial desirability bias
Affiliated Institutions
Related Publications
Individual differences and reactions to job characteristics.
Three different methods of measuring individual differences were evaluated as moderators of employee reactions to job characteristics. The three methods are urban versus rural b...
WORK-HOME INTERFERENCE AMONG NEWSPAPER MANAGERS: ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH BURNOUT AND ENGAGEMENT
Managers are increasingly concerned about managing the conflicts experienced in fulfilling the responsibilities of work and family. The problem of balancing these domains arises...
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Self-reports figure prominently in organizational and management research, but there are several problems associated with their use. This article identifies six categories of se...
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION IN WORK SETTINGS
▪ Abstract Recent research from 1993 on performance evaluations in work settings is reviewed and integrated with the prior reset and historical bases. Contemporary research refl...
Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in Organizational Behavior
Abstract Although mediational designs and analyses are quite popular in Organizational Behavior research, there is much confusion surrounding the basis of causal inferences. We ...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1981
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 377-385
- Citations
- 455
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
455
OpenAlex
Cite This
Helen Arnold,
Daniel C. Feldman
(1981).
Social Desirability Response Bias in Self-Report Choice Situations..
Academy of Management Journal
, 24
(2)
, 377-385.
https://doi.org/10.2307/255848
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/255848