Abstract

Psychological acceptance (acceptance) and emotional intelligence (EI) are two relatively new individual characteristics that are hypothesised to affect well-being and performance at work. This study compares both of them, in terms of their ability to predict various well-being outcomes (i.e. general mental health, physical well-being, and job satisfaction). In making this comparison, the effects of job control are accounted for; this is a work organisation variable that is consistently associated with occupational health and performance. Results from 290 United Kingdom workers showed that EI did not significantly predict any of the well-being outcomes, after accounting for acceptance and job control. Acceptance predicted general mental health and physical well-being but not job satisfaction, and job control was associated with job satisfaction only. Discussion focuses on the theoretical and applied implications of these findings. These include support for the suggestion that not controlling one's thoughts and feelings (as advocated by acceptance) may have greater benefits for mental well-being than attempting consciously to regulate them (as EI suggests).

Keywords

PsychologyJob satisfactionWell-beingMental healthJob performanceSocial psychologyApplied psychologyFeelingEmotional intelligenceJob attitudeLife satisfactionControl (management)Affect (linguistics)Clinical psychologyPsychotherapistManagement

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2004
Type
article
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
187-203
Citations
150
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

150
OpenAlex

Cite This

Frank W. Bond, Emma Donaldson‐Feilder (2004). The relative importance of psychological acceptance and emotional intelligence to workplace well-being. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling , 32 (2) , 187-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/08069880410001692210

Identifiers

DOI
10.1080/08069880410001692210