Abstract
The currently dominant psychological model of responsibility attribution is criticized and expanded upon from a sociological perspective. It is argued that responsibility judgments entail consideration of both what the actor did and what the actor was supposed to do: i.e., both physical deeds and social roles. Including roles in a responsibility attribution model provides: (I) a coherent account of alternative meanings of responsibility itself; (2) a social psychological approach that is congruent with rules actually followed in adult sanctioning judgments; and (3) an opportunity for social psychologists to study the crucial dichotomy of authoritative versus subordinate roles. Roles are interpreted attributionally as normative contexts within which actions are evaluated, rather than as external or situational constraints on action. In general, it is suggested that accepting a role demand as normative may evoke a purposive attribution process, labeled here as ' 'motive grammar''; rejecting the role demand may be accompanied by a causal attribution process, consequence grammar. The paper concludes with suggestions for future research possibilities.
Keywords
AttributionPsychologySocial psychologySocial responsibilityMoral responsibilityEpistemologyPublic relations
Related Publications
The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.
The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether altering attributions for failure would enable learned helpless children to deal more effectively with failure in an ex...
Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital
There are two broad intellectual streams in the description and explanation of social action. One, characteristic of the work of most sociologists, sees the actor as socialized ...
Positive psychology: An introduction.
A science of positive subjective experience, positive individual traits, and positive institutions promises to improve quality of life and prevent the pathologies that arise whe...
The Best-Laid Plans
Part of what it takes to succeed in academic settings is paying attention to and working toward appropriate goals. Working toward goals involves protecting the intention to acco...
The nature and measurement of meaning.
The language process within an individual may be viewed as a more or less continuous interaction between two parallel systems of behavioral organization: sequences of central ev...
Publication Info
- Year
- 1978
- Type
- article
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 316-316
- Citations
- 274
- Access
- Closed
External Links
Social Impact
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions
Citation Metrics
274
OpenAlex
12
Influential
200
CrossRef
Cite This
V. Lee Hamilton
(1978).
Who is Responsible? Toward a Social Psychology of Responsibility Attribution.
Social Psychology
, 41
(4)
, 316-316.
https://doi.org/10.2307/3033584
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.2307/3033584