Abstract

Among patients with ARF requiring HD survival and recovery time are not significantly influenced by the use of either meltspun cellulose diacetate or the more biocompatible high-flux or low-flux polysulfone. Dialysis using modified cellulose membranes is just as effective as dialysis using synthetic polysulfone membranes, but at a lower cost. In addition, the flux of the membrane did not influence patient outcome.

Keywords

PolysulfoneMedicineMembraneDialysisBiocompatible materialCelluloseHemodialysisSurgeryBiomedical engineeringBiochemistryChemistry

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2000
Type
article
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
224-230
Citations
125
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

125
OpenAlex

Cite This

Karine Gastaldello, Christian Mélot, R. J. Kahn et al. (2000). Comparison of cellulose diacetate and polysulfone membranes in the outcome of acute renal failure. A prospective randomized study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation , 15 (2) , 224-230. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/15.2.224

Identifiers

DOI
10.1093/ndt/15.2.224