Abstract

The past five years have seen many scientific and biological discoveries made through the experimental design of genome-wide association studies (GWASs). These studies were aimed at detecting variants at genomic loci that are associated with complex traits in the population and, in particular, at detecting associations between common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and common diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, auto-immune diseases, and psychiatric disorders. We start by giving a number of quotes from scientists and journalists about perceived problems with GWASs. We will then briefly give the history of GWASs and focus on the discoveries made through this experimental design, what those discoveries tell us and do not tell us about the genetics and biology of complex traits, and what immediate utility has come out of these studies. Rather than giving an exhaustive review of all reported findings for all diseases and other complex traits, we focus on the results for auto-immune diseases and metabolic diseases. We return to the perceived failure or disappointment about GWASs in the concluding section.

Keywords

Genome-wide association studyComputational biologyComputer scienceBiologyGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

MeSH Terms

Autoimmune DiseasesFemaleGenetic LinkageGenetic LociGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHistory21st CenturyHumansMaleMetabolic DiseasesTranslational ResearchBiomedical

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
2012
Type
review
Volume
90
Issue
1
Pages
7-24
Citations
2493
Access
Closed

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

2493
OpenAlex
108
Influential
2056
CrossRef

Cite This

Peter M. Visscher, Matthew A. Brown, Mark I. McCarthy et al. (2012). Five Years of GWAS Discovery. The American Journal of Human Genetics , 90 (1) , 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.029

Identifiers

DOI
10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.029
PMID
22243964
PMCID
PMC3257326

Data Quality

Data completeness: 90%