Abstract

Abstract This paper demonstrates the inadequacy of traditional measures, that are based on a firm's profitability, for evaluating its strategic performance. Two other measures, one that attempts to assess the quality of a firm's transformations (and not merely its outcomes) and the other that attempts to measure the satisfaction of all of the firm's stakeholders (and not merely its stockholders), are shown here to be important discriminators of strategic performance. The performances of seven ‘excellent’ firms from the computer industry, featured in the recent book by Peters and Waterman, are contrasted with that of seven ‘non‐excellent’ firms from the same industry, to develop a framework for measuring strategic performance.

Keywords

Profitability indexShareholderStrategic managementIndustrial organizationQuality (philosophy)BusinessMarketingMeasure (data warehouse)Strategic fitPerformance measurementProcess managementComputer scienceCorporate governanceFinance

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Publication Info

Year
1986
Type
article
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
437-458
Citations
1294
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

1294
OpenAlex

Cite This

Balaji S. Chakravarthy (1986). Measuring strategic performance. Strategic Management Journal , 7 (5) , 437-458. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070505

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/smj.4250070505