Abstract

Abstract A new, multi‐item scale for operationalizing Miles and Snow's (1978) strategic typology— defenders, prospectors, analyzers, and reactors—is proposed and field‐tested in this paper. Relatively pure strategic types, identified as those organizations classified similarly using both the newly developed, multi‐item scale and the traditionally employed paragraph approach, are used to analyze the relationship between strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies, and organizational performance. Results of analysis suggest that while the marketing competencies of prospector organizations are superior to those of analyzer, defender, and reactor organizations, all three stable archetypes perform equally well in terms of profitability and outperform reactors. The newly developed strategic types scale performs well and appears to possess significant managerial and research potential. It is theoretically anchored, easily administered, and possesses diagnostic value to both strategists and their organizations.

Keywords

OperationalizationTypologyMarketingStrategic planningScale (ratio)Profitability indexBusinessStrategic managementStrategic marketingOrganizational performanceParagraphKnowledge managementProcess managementMarketing strategyComputer scienceSociology

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Measuring strategic performance

Abstract This paper demonstrates the inadequacy of traditional measures, that are based on a firm's profitability, for evaluating its strategic performance. Two other measures, ...

1986 Strategic Management Journal 1294 citations

Publication Info

Year
1990
Type
article
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
365-383
Citations
965
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

965
OpenAlex

Cite This

Jeffrey S. Conant, Michael P. Mokwa, P. Rajan Varadarajan (1990). Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures‐based study. Strategic Management Journal , 11 (5) , 365-383. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110504

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/smj.4250110504