Abstract

Organizational learning has many virtues, virtues which recent writings in strategic management have highlighted. Learning processes, however, are subject to some important limitations. As is well-known, learning has to cope with confusing experience and the complicated problem of balancing the competing goals of developing new knowledge (i.e., exploring) and exploiting current competencies in the face of dynamic tendencies to emphasize one or the other. We examine the ways organizations approach these problems through simplification and specialization and how those approaches contribute to three forms of learning myopia, the tendency to overlook distant times, distant places, and failures, and we identify some ways in which organizations sustain exploration in the face of a tendency to overinvest in exploitation. We conclude that the imperfections of learning are not so great as to require abandoning attempts to improve the learning capabilities of organizations, but that those imperfections suggest a certain conservatism in expectations.

Keywords

Face (sociological concept)ConservatismOrganizational learningSubject (documents)AmbidexterityPsychologyKnowledge managementBusinessCognitive scienceSociologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceSocial science

Affiliated Institutions

Related Publications

Making sense of nonbusiness accounting.

The nonbusiness world of municipalities, colleges and universities, hospitals, and other nonprofit organizations follows its own rules when it comes to financial statements, and...

1980 PubMed 172 citations

Publication Info

Year
1993
Type
article
Volume
14
Issue
S2
Pages
95-112
Citations
6989
Access
Closed

External Links

Social Impact

Altmetric
PlumX Metrics

Social media, news, blog, policy document mentions

Citation Metrics

6989
OpenAlex

Cite This

Daniel A. Levinthal, James G. March (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal , 14 (S2) , 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009

Identifiers

DOI
10.1002/smj.4250141009